From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Cc: Lisa Week <Lisa.Week@sun.com>, Sam Falkner <Sam.Falkner@sun.com>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, "Noveck,
Dave" <Dave.Noveck@netapp.com>,
Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@sun.com>,
Brian Pawlowski <beepy@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction / mask, draft-ietf-nfsv4-acls-00 not ready
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:07:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607101007.43824.agruen@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C98692FD98048C41885E0B0FACD9DFB8028CEAAC@exnane01.hq.netapp.com>
On Saturday, 8. July 2006 17:04, Noveck, Dave wrote:
> Andreas has asked that we consider his proposal when disucssing
> where to go with regard to ACL in v4.1, at the Montreal IETF
> meeting.
>
> I'm wondering whether we should be discussing specific mechanisms.
IMO this depends on the time you want to allocate for it. The topic is
nontrivial, so discussing the various aspects will probably take an hour or
more, depending on how many basic POSIX concepts need to be revisited.
> It would help me if we could have a discussion of what the goals
> should be for ACL's in v4.1. This isn't resally clear to me but
> it could be due to my lack of attention to the matter.
NFSv4 ACLs have known weaknesses in POSIX environments which implement ACLs in
one form or another (be it the POSIX draft ACLs or NFSv4 ACLs). Both kinds of
ACLs can be implemented in a way so that they are POSIX compliant. Generic
NFSv4 ACLs are not POSIX compliant by themselves though. My goals for NFSv4.1
ACLs would be to:
- define mechanisms which can be used to achieve *full* POSIX compliance of
NFSv4.1 ACLs, on systems which implement a POSIX compliant ACL model,
- ensure that the mechanisms are general enough to not restrict the NFSv4
ACL model more than absolutely necessary,
- ensure that both POSIX-to-POSIX and Windows-to-Windows system interaction
will be as flawless as can be,
- ensure that POSIX-to-Windows and Windows-to-POSIX system interaction will
be as flawless as can be,
- design the mechanisms is a way so that they have as few artefacts as can
be, and finally,
- NFSv4.1 ACLs should not limit our possible future design options more than
absolutely necessary. In particular, they should not preclude alternative
solutions which achieve the same goals.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Novell / SUSE Labs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-10 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-08 15:04 Re: NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction / mask, draft-ietf-nfsv4-acls-00 not ready Noveck, Dave
2006-07-08 19:27 ` [nfsv4] " Lisa Week
2006-07-10 8:07 ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2006-07-10 14:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-10 15:25 ` Spencer Shepler
2006-07-10 23:48 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-11 0:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-21 17:16 Yoder, Alan
2006-07-23 15:45 ` [nfsv4] " Sam Falkner
2006-07-21 15:10 Noveck, Dave
2006-07-21 18:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-23 15:47 ` Sam Falkner
2006-07-25 0:32 ` [nfsv4] " a.gruenbacher
2006-07-25 4:26 ` Sam Falkner
2006-07-25 20:15 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-26 4:59 ` Sam Falkner
2006-07-26 13:00 ` [nfsv4] " J. Bruce Fields
2006-08-03 13:46 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-08-04 0:30 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-08-04 1:37 ` Sam Falkner
2006-08-04 10:35 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-08-04 11:19 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-08-04 20:20 ` Sam Falkner
2006-07-16 13:10 Noveck, Dave
2006-07-18 22:08 ` Sam Falkner
2006-07-14 18:29 Noveck, Dave
2006-07-14 18:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-03 21:10 NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction / mask Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-07 11:55 ` NFSv4 ACL and POSIX interaction / mask, draft-ietf-nfsv4-acls-00 not ready Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-08 3:45 ` Sam Falkner
2006-07-08 6:51 ` [nfsv4] " Lisa Week
2006-07-09 16:22 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-10 13:29 ` Sam Falkner
2006-07-10 14:15 ` [nfsv4] " J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-10 15:32 ` Sam Falkner
2006-07-10 18:57 ` [NFS] " J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-10 22:26 ` [nfsv4] " Sam Falkner
2006-07-10 22:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-10 22:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-11 0:44 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-11 0:15 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-11 5:42 ` [nfsv4] " Sam Falkner
2006-07-11 8:05 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-11 12:29 ` [nfsv4] " Sam Falkner
2006-07-11 13:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-15 13:56 ` [nfsv4] " Sam Falkner
2006-07-11 0:01 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-11 0:28 ` [nfsv4] " J. Bruce Fields
2006-07-11 0:48 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-10 22:50 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-11 6:17 ` [nfsv4] " Sam Falkner
2006-07-11 8:45 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-11 12:44 ` [nfsv4] " Sam Falkner
2006-07-11 6:50 ` Lisa Week
2006-07-11 8:55 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-27 0:59 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-07-28 6:32 ` Lisa Week
2006-08-01 10:36 ` [nfsv4] " Andreas Gruenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200607101007.43824.agruen@suse.de \
--to=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=Dave.Noveck@netapp.com \
--cc=Lisa.Week@sun.com \
--cc=Sam.Falkner@sun.com \
--cc=beepy@netapp.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=nfsv4@ietf.org \
--cc=spencer.shepler@sun.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.