From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] 0/15 IO scheduler improvements
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 13:06:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060715110638.GC22724@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607142253.26372.a1426z@gawab.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1605 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 14 2006, Al Boldi wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13 2006, Al Boldi wrote:
> > > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > This is a continuation of the patches posted yesterday, I continued
> > > > to build on them. The patch series does:
> > > >
> > > > - Move the hash backmerging into the elevator core.
> > > > - Move the rbtree handling into the elevator core.
> > > > - Abstract the FIFO handling into the elevator core.
> > > > - Kill the io scheduler private requests, that require allocation/free
> > > > for each request passed through the system.
> > > >
> > > > The result is a faster elevator core (and faster IO schedulers), with
> > > > a nice net reduction of kernel text and code as well.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Your efforts are much appreciated, as the current situation is a bit
> > > awkward.
> >
> > It's a good step forward, at least.
> >
> > > > If you have time, please give this patch series a test spin just to
> > > > verify that everything still works for you. Thanks!
> > >
> > > Do you have a combo-patch against 2.6.17?
> >
> > Not really, but git let me generate one pretty easily. It has a few
> > select changes outside of the patchset as well, but should be ok. It's
> > not tested though, should work but the rbtree changes needed to be done
> > additionally. If it boots, it should work :-)
>
> patch applies ok
> compiles ok
> panics on boot at elv_rb_del
> patch -R succeeds with lot's of hunks
So I most likely botched the rbtree conversion, sorry about that. Oh, I
think it's a silly reverted condition, can you try this one?
--
Jens Axboe
[-- Attachment #2: iosched-rollup-2.6.17.4-2.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 25948 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-15 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-13 20:50 [PATCHSET] 0/15 IO scheduler improvements Al Boldi
2006-07-14 7:15 ` Jens Axboe
2006-07-14 19:53 ` Al Boldi
2006-07-15 11:06 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-07-15 12:35 ` Al Boldi
2006-07-15 17:46 ` Jens Axboe
2006-07-15 20:27 ` Al Boldi
2006-07-16 11:26 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-13 12:46 Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060715110638.GC22724@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.