From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 08:41:43 -0400
Message-ID: <200607160841.44085.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <44B6B53B.80802@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <44B6B53B.80802@us.ibm.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Thursday 13 July 2006 17:03, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> In doing some tests, I've noticed that the USER_ROLE_CHANGE audit record
> is associated with both newrole, and semanage user -[ad].

semanage should also be using these:

#define AUDIT_ROLE_ASSIGN            2301 /* Admin assigned user to role */
#define AUDIT_ROLE_REMOVE          2302 /* Admin removed user from role */

USER_ROLE_CHANGE should only be used when newrole is used. If semanage needs 
more record types let me know.

-Steve