From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751195AbWGQVL6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:11:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751197AbWGQVL6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:11:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:53461 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751195AbWGQVL5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:11:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:04:25 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Kylene Jo Hall Cc: stable@kernel.org, Greg KH , torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , Zwane Mwaikambo , Justin Forbes , linux-kernel , Chris Wedgwood , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix] Message-ID: <20060717210425.GA16076@kroah.com> References: <1153161320.4808.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1153161320.4808.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:35:20AM -0700, Kylene Jo Hall wrote: > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Kylene Jo Hall > To: linux-os (Dick Johnson) > Cc: linux-kernel , TPM Device Driver List > , akpm@osdl.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix > Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:24:36 -0700 > Under stress testing I found that the interrupt is not always cleared. > This is a bug and this patch should go into 2.6.18 and 2.6.17.x. > > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 07:45 -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: > > > PCI devices need a final read to flush all pending writes. Whatever > > mb() does, just hides the problem. > > > Signed-off-by: Kylene Hall > --- > > --- linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c 2006-07-13 14:46:39.727500500 -0500 > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc1-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c 2006-07-13 14:47:33.878884750 -0500 > @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int i > iowrite32(interrupt, > chip->vendor.iobase + > TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality)); > + ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality)); > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } So does this replace the other tpm patch? Or should we apply both of them? thanks, greg k-h