From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: Netchannles: first stage has been completed. Further ideas. Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:20:46 +0400 Message-ID: <20060721072044.GC5151@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20060719131915.GA21942@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <20060720073223.GA15567@tservice.net.ru> <20060720164100.GA9213@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <20060720210849.GA28715@tservice.net.ru> <44BFF3F5.3040104@candelatech.com> <20060721071900.GB5151@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:23012 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161007AbWGUHVB (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:21:01 -0400 To: Ben Greear Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060721071900.GB5151@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 11:19:00AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru) wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:21:57PM -0700, Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com) wrote: > > Out of curiosity, is it possible to have the single producer logic > > if you have two+ ethernet interfaces handling frames for a single > > TCP connection? (I am assuming some sort of multi-path routing > > logic...) > > I do not think it is possible with additional logic like what is I think it is posssible ... -- Evgeniy Polyakov