All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Netchannles: first stage has been completed. Further ideas.
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:39:09 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060721093909.GA14290@2ka.mipt.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060721.021955.104040230.davem@davemloft.net>

On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:19:55AM -0700, David Miller (davem@davemloft.net) wrote:
> From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:06:11 +0400
> 
> > Receiving side, nor matter if it is socket or netchannel, will drop
> > packets (socket due to queue overfull, netchannels will not drop, but
> > will not ack (it's maximum queue len is 1mb)).
> > 
> > So both approaches behave _exactly_ the same.
> > Did I miss something?
> 
> Socket will not drop the packets on receive because sender will not
> violate the window which receiver advertises, therefore there is no
> reason to drop the packets.

How come?
sk_stream_rmem_schedule(), sk_rmem_alloc and friends...

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-21  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-18  8:16 Netchannles: first stage has been completed. Further ideas Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-18  8:34 ` David Miller
2006-07-18  8:50   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-18 11:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2006-07-18 11:51   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-18 12:36     ` Christian Borntraeger
2006-07-18 19:11       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-18 21:20         ` David Miller
2006-07-18 12:15 ` Jörn Engel
2006-07-18 19:08   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-19 11:00     ` Jörn Engel
2006-07-20  7:42       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-18 23:01 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-07-19  0:39   ` David Miller
2006-07-19  5:38   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-19  6:30     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-19 13:19     ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-07-20  7:32       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-20 16:41         ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-07-20 21:08           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-20 21:21             ` Ben Greear
2006-07-21  7:19               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-21  7:20                 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-21 16:14                 ` Ben Greear
2006-07-21 16:27                   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-22 13:23                   ` Caitlin Bestler
2006-07-20 21:40             ` Ian McDonald
2006-07-21  7:26               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-20 22:59             ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-07-21  4:55               ` David Miller
2006-07-21  7:10                 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-21  7:47                   ` David Miller
2006-07-21  9:06                     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-21  9:19                       ` David Miller
2006-07-21  9:39                         ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2006-07-21  9:46                           ` David Miller
2006-07-21  9:55                             ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-21 16:26                 ` Rick Jones
2006-07-21 20:57                   ` David Miller
2006-07-19 19:52   ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-07-19 20:01     ` David Miller
2006-07-19 20:16       ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-07-24 18:54       ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-07-24 20:52         ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-07-27  2:17   ` Rusty Russell
2006-07-27  5:17     ` David Miller
2006-07-27  5:46       ` Rusty Russell
2006-07-27  6:00         ` David Miller
2006-07-27 18:54           ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-07-28  8:21             ` David Miller
2006-07-28  5:54           ` Rusty Russell
2006-08-01  4:47             ` David Miller
2006-08-01  6:36               ` Rusty Russell
2006-07-27 16:33         ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-07-27 16:51           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-27 20:56             ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-07-28  5:17               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-28  5:34                 ` David Miller
2006-07-28  5:47                   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-07-28  4:49           ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060721093909.GA14290@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.