From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>,
len.brown@intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.18-rc1-git] rtc-acpi, with wakeup support
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:25:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607250825.42928.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607241244.36574.david-b@pacbell.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1291 bytes --]
Hi David.
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 05:44, David Brownell wrote:
> Hmm, so -- any comments? This applies just fine to RC2 of course
> (it came out minutes before RC2 "shipped"). Seems to me this would
> be appropriate for the next MM release.
Didn't notice it before now. I'll forward your message to suspend2-devel (we
have people there who might be interested), and try it myself.
> Also, given some mechanism to tell whether this alarm woke the system,
> this would seem to be the kind of infrastructure needed to make the
> "deepening suspend" work correctly. That is, idle system enters the
> light weight "standby" powersave mode, then if it stays idle for long
> enough for the timer to wake it could enter suspend-to-RAM (or that
> new "suspend-to-both" mode). There's certainly enough idle time on
> most laptops for such mechanisms to help save significant amounts of
> battery power, and it's best if such things don't explicitly depend
> on features like ACPI.
Yes. I'll look at it with a view to seeing if we can use it in Suspend2. I get
requests for it from time to time, and it would be good to finally be able to
do it.
Regards,
Nigel
--
Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham
5 Mitchell Street
Cobden 3266
Victoria, Australia
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-24 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-15 19:40 [patch 2.6.18-rc1-git] rtc-acpi, with wakeup support David Brownell
2006-07-15 19:48 ` rtcwakeup.c David Brownell
2006-07-24 19:44 ` [patch 2.6.18-rc1-git] rtc-acpi, with wakeup support David Brownell
2006-07-24 22:25 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2006-09-29 6:54 ` [patch 2.6.18-git] " David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200607250825.42928.ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--to=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.