From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:31:53 +0000 Subject: Re: ppp 2.4.4 eap-tls patch Message-Id: <20060725113152.GA14762@wonderland.linux.it> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" List-Id: References: <44C5F014.40202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44C5F014.40202@gmail.com> To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Jul 25, James Cameron wrote: > You've used OpenSSL, which has a license that is not altogether open, > specifically clause 6 which requires acknowledgement. Is there any > reason why you couldn't use MatrixSSL? I would hate to see EAP-TLS depend on a niche license. I do not think I would enable EAP-TLS in the Debian package in this case since it would require pulling the MatrixSSL package in the base system. If you do not like the advertisement clause in the OpenSSL license there is libgnutls which is LGPL'ed and widely used (and has a sane API...). --=20 ciao, Marco --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFExgEoFGfw2OHuP7ERAki7AJ9oXDq/qNXoM0z8i+pQqg8TwTgO7gCdFLos hUZ3QDonXvgRK71vcYzPzDQ= =cKtc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--