From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:07:56 +0000
Subject: Re: ppp 2.4.4 eap-tls patch
Message-Id: <20060725230756.GA8907@wonderland.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j"
List-Id: <linux-ppp.vger.kernel.org>
References: <44C5F014.40202@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <44C5F014.40202@gmail.com>
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org


--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Jul 26, James Cameron <james.cameron@hp.com> wrote:

> > > Is there any reason why you couldn't use MatrixSSL?
> > I would hate to see EAP-TLS depend on a niche license.
> MatrixSSL is dual licensed, and last I checked the GPL is quite common
Sorry, I meant "on a niche library", as in "I do not want to add another
dependency without a good reason".

--=20
ciao,
Marco

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFExqRMFGfw2OHuP7ERAlblAKCOQRyhL5tz3JVcrP+VjbrW1bmOXwCglsGd
bzdBSqsLntR+dUIquRxpjwA=
=HYR4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--