From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, eike-kernel@sf-tec.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aia21@cantab.net,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] possible recursive locking detected
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:46:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060727094617.GA5955@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1153992484.21849.36.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk>
* Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> An example is the potential deadlock in generic buffered file write
> where we fault in a page via fault_in_pages_readable() but there is
> nothing to guarantee that page will not go away between us doing this
> and us using the page.
isnt this solved by:
commit 6527c2bdf1f833cc18e8f42bd97973d583e4aa83
Author: Vladimir V. Saveliev <vs@namesys.com>
Date: Tue Jun 27 02:53:57 2006 -0700
[PATCH] generic_file_buffered_write(): deadlock on vectored write
?
if not, do you have any description of the problem or a link to previous
discussion[s] outlining the problem? To me it appears this is a kernel
bug where we simply dropped the ball to fix it. I personally dont find
it acceptable to have deadlocks in the kernel, where all that is needed
to trigger it is "high i/o loads", no matter how hard it is to fix the
deadlock.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-27 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-26 16:05 [BUG?] possible recursive locking detected Rolf Eike Beer
2006-07-27 5:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-27 6:51 ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-27 7:15 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-07-27 7:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-27 8:19 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-07-27 8:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-27 9:28 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-07-27 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-07-27 14:31 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-07-27 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-27 18:04 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-27 9:18 ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-27 9:35 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-07-27 10:02 ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-27 12:30 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-07-27 7:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-27 7:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-12-07 16:11 [bug]: " Yclept Nemo
2016-12-07 21:49 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060727094617.GA5955@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=aia21@cantab.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.