From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: DAEMON_END message subj field
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:06:17 -0400
Message-ID: <200607271106.17222.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <44C8D2E5.6090002@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <44C8D2E5.6090002@us.ibm.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Thursday 27 July 2006 10:51, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> Hey Steve,
>
> In the DAEMON_END message, it seems like the subj context is cut short:

Will fix.

> CONFIG_CHANGE and others include the MLS label, but DAEMON_END does
> not... is this by design or an oversight?

I haven't worked on this. You're testing for things I haven't had a chance to 
address. :) I'll fix this in next update.

-Steve