From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751311AbWG0OFu (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:05:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751323AbWG0OFu (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:05:50 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:6545 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751311AbWG0OFt (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:05:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:05:39 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Pavel Machek Cc: vojtech@suse.cz, Len Brown , kernel list , linux-thinkpad@linux-thinkpad.org, multinymous@gmail.com Subject: Re: Generic battery interface Message-ID: <20060727140539.GA10835@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20060727002035.GA2896@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060727002035.GA2896@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vavatch.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This would also be useful for the OLPC project - it's unlikely that it'll use ACPI, but a more feature-rich interface than /proc/apm would be massively helpful. This is just a matter of speccing out what information is needed and what format it should be presented in, and then adding a new device class, right? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org