All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix Intel RNG detection
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:23:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607271623.48023.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44C8BE63.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>

On Thursday 27 July 2006 13:23, Jan Beulich wrote:

> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static volatile char __initdata waitflag;

I don't think we want to add yet another use of volatile
(see the kernel archives for why).
Use memory barriers instead, please.

> +static void __init intel_init_wait (void *unused)
> +{
> +	while (waitflag) {
> +		cpu_relax();
		rmb();
	}
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static int __init mod_init(void)
>  {
>  	int err = -ENODEV;
> +	unsigned i;
> +	struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
>  	void __iomem *mem;
> -	u8 hw_status;
> -
> -	if (!pci_dev_present(pci_tbl))
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u8 bios_cntl_off, fwh_dec_en1_off;
> +	u8 bios_cntl_val = 0xff, fwh_dec_en1_val = 0xff;
> +	u8 hw_status, mfg, dvc;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; !dev && pci_tbl[i].vendor; ++i)
> +		dev = pci_get_device(pci_tbl[i].vendor,
> pci_tbl[i].device, NULL);
> +		
> +	if (!dev)
>  		goto out; /* Device not found. */
>  
> +	/* Check for Intel 82802 */
> +	if (dev->device < 0x2640) {
> +		fwh_dec_en1_off = 0xe3;
> +		bios_cntl_off = 0x4e;
> +	}
> +	else {
> +		fwh_dec_en1_off = 0xd9; /* high byte of 16-bit register
> */
> +		bios_cntl_off = 0xdc;
> +	}
> +
> +	pci_read_config_byte(dev, fwh_dec_en1_off, &fwh_dec_en1_val);
> +	pci_read_config_byte(dev, bios_cntl_off, &bios_cntl_val);
> +
> +	mem = ioremap_nocache(0xffff0000, 2);
> +	if (mem == NULL) {
> +		pci_dev_put(dev);
> +		err = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +	waitflag = 1;
	wmb();
> +	if (smp_call_function(intel_init_wait, NULL, 1, 0) != 0) {
> +		waitflag = 0;
> +		pci_dev_put(dev);
> +		printk(KERN_ERR PFX "cannot run on all processors\n");
> +		err = -EAGAIN;
> +		goto err_unmap;
> +	}
> +#else
> +#define waitflag err

That's really confusing magic.

> +#endif
> +	local_irq_save(flags);
> +
> +	if (!(fwh_dec_en1_val & 0x80))
> +		pci_write_config_byte(dev, fwh_dec_en1_off,
> fwh_dec_en1_val | 0x80);
> +	if (!(bios_cntl_val & 0x03))
> +		pci_write_config_byte(dev, bios_cntl_off, bios_cntl_val
> | 0x01);
> +
> +	writeb(0xff, mem);
> +	writeb(0x90, mem);
> +	mfg = readb(mem + 0);
> +	dvc = readb(mem + 1);
> +	writeb(0xff, mem);

Do these magic registers have names? Possible to use #defines for it?

> +	if (!(bios_cntl_val & 0x03))
> +		pci_write_config_byte(dev, bios_cntl_off,
> bios_cntl_val);
> +	if (!(fwh_dec_en1_val & 0x80))
> +		pci_write_config_byte(dev, fwh_dec_en1_off,
> fwh_dec_en1_val);

Same for these magic bitmasks.

> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> +	waitflag = 0;
	smp_wmb();
> +
> +	iounmap(mem);
> +	pci_dev_put(dev);
> +
> +	if (mfg != 0x89 || (dvc & ~0x01) != 0xac) {

magic values...

> +		printk(KERN_ERR PFX "FWH not detected\n");
> +		err = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	err = -ENOMEM;
>  	mem = ioremap(INTEL_RNG_ADDR, INTEL_RNG_ADDR_LEN);
>  	if (!mem)
>  		goto out;
>  	intel_rng.priv = (unsigned long)mem;
>  
> -	/* Check for Intel 82802 */
> +	/* Check for Random Number Generator */
>  	err = -ENODEV;
>  	hw_status = hwstatus_get(mem);
>  	if ((hw_status & INTEL_RNG_PRESENT) == 0)

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-27 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-27 11:23 [PATCH] fix Intel RNG detection Jan Beulich
2006-07-27 14:23 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2006-07-27 15:16   ` Jan Beulich
2006-07-27 15:18 ` gmu 2k6
2006-07-27 15:35   ` gmu 2k6
2006-07-27 15:43     ` Jan Beulich
2006-07-27 15:51       ` gmu 2k6

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200607271623.48023.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.