From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1G6EFO-0001el-Ci for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:22:26 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G6EFM-0001ea-0W for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:22:24 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G6EFJ-0001eD-ME for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:22:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6EFJ-0001eA-Fe for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:22:21 -0400 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G6EHA-0007vM-Ca for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:24:16 -0400 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9533CA506B3 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:21:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00793CA506B2 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:21:50 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:22:20 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <8764hilmnn.fsf@night.trouble.net> In-Reply-To: <8764hilmnn.fsf@night.trouble.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607280022.20153.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.487096, version=0.17.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not require console control protocol. X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:22:24 -0000 On Friday 28 July 2006 00:15, Johan Rydberg wrote: > I would like to have the following patch committed. Some EFI > implementations do not provide a console control protocol instance, > and it is covered by neither EFI or UEFI specifications. Right, right. My code was only for testing, so it was not good, generally speaking. BTW, can I add you into the project members of GRUB so that you can commit patches yourself? Thanks, Okuji