From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6S79HnW016274 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:09:17 -0400 Received: from dot.freshdot.net (IDENT:4f9f700a3d90a3f38d6bbcb208323ae6@dot.freshdot.net [80.69.73.239]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6S79BQf004609 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:09:14 -0400 Received: from ssmeenk by dot.freshdot.net with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1G6MT3-0005AW-Oy for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:09:05 +0200 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:09:05 +0200 From: Sander Smeenk Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Performance impact of LVM Message-ID: <20060728070905.GI17454@freshdot.net> References: <20060727120250.GB17454@freshdot.net> <44C8DC2D.3000408@conterra.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <44C8DC2D.3000408@conterra.de> Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Quoting Dieter St=EF=BF=BDken (stueken@conterra.de): > > I've recently subscribed here as i have some questions about LVM, > > particularly the performance impact of LVM on disk IO. > impact? no, I don't think so. Okay, that's a clear start :-) > http://www.suse.com/en/whitepapers/lvm/lvm1.html#perf > .. although, its a bit outdated, as they still use LVM1...=20 I'll read it anyways! Thanks alot. --=20 | If you're too open-minded, your brain will fall out. | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D