From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, Jan Dittmer <jdi@l4x.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Jirka Lenost Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: ipw3945 status
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 11:09:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060730150944.GG23279@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1154271654.13635.33.camel@localhost>
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 05:00:54PM +0200, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> thats entirely different, if some firmware image is loaded into a card,
> thats that, but running a userspace daemon is just entirely different,
> what would happen if intel for some reason stopped supporting earlier
> cards(as hardware manufactureres do after some time), and linux
> kernel/userspace gets some change, preventing the binary daemon from
> running? then what? we have lost.
Um, last time I checked we could still run some *minix* binaries from
before Linux was born, and we still can run statically linked a.out
programs created over a decade ago. I don't think this is a serious
objection, given that historically the Linux kernel/userspace syscall
interface has been quite stable.
Of course, I'd recomend against said driver using sysfs, but Greg K-H
tells us that all breakagaes are the fault of buggy device drivers
(just as supposedly all swsuspend problems are also about buggy device
drivers), so I guess we're OK. :-)
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-30 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-30 10:40 ipw3945 status Pavel Machek
2006-07-30 11:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-07-30 11:30 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-30 11:34 ` Jan Dittmer
2006-07-30 11:47 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-07-30 13:01 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 14:53 ` Theodore Tso
2006-07-30 15:00 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 15:09 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2006-07-30 16:09 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 16:25 ` Jan Dittmer
2006-07-30 16:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-07-30 17:52 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-30 23:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-31 0:23 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-31 1:16 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-31 6:06 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-07-31 8:32 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 16:58 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-07-30 17:25 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 17:37 ` Rene Rebe
2006-07-30 18:03 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 20:09 ` Rene Rebe
2006-07-30 21:02 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-30 23:44 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-31 0:19 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-31 7:11 ` Rene Rebe
2006-07-30 15:57 ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-07-30 16:01 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060730150944.GG23279@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=jdi@l4x.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.