From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ondemand: updated tune for hardware coordination Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:37:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20060731223750.GG31513@redhat.com> References: <44CE4B10.6080506@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44CE4B10.6080506@linux.intel.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alexey Starikovskiy Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:25:20PM +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > > cpufreq_ondemand.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > Try to make dbs_check_cpu() call on all CPUs at the same jiffy. > This will help when multiple cores share P-states via Hardware Coordination. > > Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi > Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy Still doesn't apply.. error: patch failed: drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:303 error: drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: patch does not apply > Index: linux-2.6.15.1/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c ^^^^^^^^ Hmmm? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk