From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932285AbWHAIxi (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 04:53:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932287AbWHAIxi (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 04:53:38 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:2753 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932285AbWHAIxh (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 04:53:37 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 01:53:29 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Andi Kleen Cc: samel@mail.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: too low MAX_MP_BUSSES Message-Id: <20060801015329.9ffa5b86.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060801084637.GB21698@muc.de> References: <20060731115545.GA3292@pc11.op.pod.cz> <20060801013826.09c9324d.akpm@osdl.org> <20060801084637.GB21698@muc.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1 Aug 2006 10:46:37 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > > mach-default uses 32 and mach-generic uses 260, so I doubt if there's a big > > downside to increasing mach-default. I expect distros ship with > > mach-generic, so you're a rare case. > > > > > > > > Andi? Can you see any problems with increasing the mach-default setting? > > No, except for wasting a bit of memory (maybe make it dependent on CONFIG_TINY?) Sounds sane, thanks. I'll do a patch.