From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: auditctl question Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:06:48 -0400 Message-ID: <200608031706.48393.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <20060731171437.GA447@clif.cflynt.com> <20060803151814.GC5964@w-m-p.com> <17B584B5C0638745ADF6002331331FDFA7D6F1@aplesliberty.dom1.jhuapl.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <17B584B5C0638745ADF6002331331FDFA7D6F1@aplesliberty.dom1.jhuapl.edu> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: linux-audit@redhat.com Cc: "Williams, P. Lane" List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Thursday 03 August 2006 16:02, Williams, P. Lane wrote: > I also received the same error with the other kernel. =C2=A0I did not b= uild the > SE-Linux stuff into the kernel, should I have? I think the kernel headers are your problem. I don't think I'd replace th= at.=20 And you do not have to have SE Linux enabled since this is a define from = the=20 audit kernel headers. That said, I don't think you need to rebuild the u= ser=20 space package.=20 The problem you are seeing would be a kernel bug most likely. It is what=20 evaluates the rules and decides if it needs to output an event. So, with = the=20 new kernel and auditctl from Suse, do you see the problem? Thanks, -Steve