From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: Options depending on STANDALONE Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:51:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20060803205127.GC10935@kroah.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:6049 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751378AbWHCU4H (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:56:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Brown, Len" Cc: Adrian Bunk , Dave Jones , Zachary Amsden , Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Rusty Russell , Jack Lo , v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:49:08PM -0400, Brown, Len wrote: > I've advised SuSE many times that they should not be shipping it, > as it means that their supported OS is running on modified firmware -- > which, by definition, they can not support. Indeed, one could view > this method as couter-productive to the evolution of Linux -- > since it is our stated goal to run on the same machines that Windows > runs on -- without requiring customers to modify those machines > to run Linux. Ok, if it's your position that we should not support this, I'll see what I can do to remove it from our kernel tree... If there are any other patches that we are carrying that you (or anyone else) feel we should not be, please let me know. thanks, greg k-h