From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] acpi-cpufreq: merge acpi functionality of cpufreq drivers Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:03:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20060804170338.GK7265@redhat.com> References: <44CE4F8A.5060600@linux.intel.com> <20060802092733.GI17014@poupinou.org> <44D0F292.8090403@linux.intel.com> <20060803161130.GL17014@poupinou.org> <20060803162024.GA22448@redhat.com> <20060804092212.GO17014@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060804092212.GO17014@poupinou.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bruno Ducrot Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:22:12AM +0200, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > > Newer VIA CPUs rely on this driver rather than longhaul for example. > > Ah I see. In fact we could add them already to > speedstep-centrino.c easily. We could, though they need to rely on the ACPI tables rather than hardcoded tables (as we've no way to distinguish regular from ULV parts afaics), at which point it doesn't really buy us anything over just using acpi-cpufreq which works without any modifications. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk