From: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk,
herbert@13thfloor.at, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clean up OCFS2 nlink handling
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:38:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060804213856.GP29686@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1154725292.10109.41.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Dave,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:01:32PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> OK, I hope this does it.
I think the last part of your patch is bad :/ At any rate, I think the
attached patch fixes up the last hunk for you. HTH.
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
OCFS2 does some operations on i_nlink, then reverts them if some
of its operations fail to complete. This does not fit in well
with the inode_drop_nlink() logic where we expect i_nlink to stay
at zero once it gets there.
So, delay all of the nlink operations until we're sure that the
operations have completed. Also, introduce a small helper to
check whether an inode has proper "unlinkable" i_nlink counts
no matter whether it is a directory or regular inode.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
index 0673862..666953b 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c
@@ -744,11 +744,23 @@ bail:
return err;
}
+static inline inode_is_unlinkable(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
+ if (inode->i_nlink == 2)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (inode->i_nlink == 1)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *dir,
struct dentry *dentry)
{
int status;
- unsigned int saved_nlink = 0;
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb);
u64 blkno;
@@ -760,6 +772,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
struct buffer_head *dirent_bh = NULL;
char orphan_name[OCFS2_ORPHAN_NAMELEN + 1];
struct buffer_head *orphan_entry_bh = NULL;
+ unsigned int future_nlink;
mlog_entry("(0x%p, 0x%p, '%.*s')\n", dir, dentry,
dentry->d_name.len, dentry->d_name.name);
@@ -823,18 +836,11 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
}
}
- /* There are still a few steps left until we can consider the
- * unlink to have succeeded. Save off nlink here before
- * modification so we can set it back in case we hit an issue
- * before commit. */
- saved_nlink = inode->i_nlink;
- if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
- inode->i_nlink = 0;
+ if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && (inode->i_nlink == 2))
+ future_nlink = 0;
else
- inode->i_nlink--;
-
- status = ocfs2_request_unlink_vote(inode, dentry,
- (unsigned int) inode->i_nlink);
+ future_nlink = inode->i_nlink - 1;
+ status = ocfs2_request_unlink_vote(inode, dentry, future_nlink);
if (status < 0) {
/* This vote should succeed under all normal
* circumstances. */
@@ -842,7 +848,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
goto leave;
}
- if (!inode->i_nlink) {
+ if (inode_is_unlinkable(inode)) {
status = ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir(osb, handle, inode,
orphan_name,
&orphan_entry_bh);
@@ -869,7 +875,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) fe_bh->b_data;
- if (!inode->i_nlink) {
+ if (inode_is_unlinkable(inode)) {
status = ocfs2_orphan_add(osb, handle, inode, fe, orphan_name,
orphan_entry_bh);
if (status < 0) {
@@ -885,10 +891,10 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
goto leave;
}
- /* We can set nlink on the dinode now. clear the saved version
- * so that it doesn't get set later. */
+ if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
+ inode_drop_nlink(inode);
+ inode_drop_nlink(inode);
fe->i_links_count = cpu_to_le16(inode->i_nlink);
- saved_nlink = 0;
status = ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, fe_bh);
if (status < 0) {
@@ -897,19 +903,16 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
}
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
- dir->i_nlink--;
+ inode_drop_nlink(dir);
status = ocfs2_mark_inode_dirty(handle, dir,
parent_node_bh);
if (status < 0) {
mlog_errno(status);
- dir->i_nlink++;
+ inode_inc_nlink(dir);
}
}
leave:
- if (status < 0 && saved_nlink)
- inode->i_nlink = saved_nlink;
-
if (handle)
ocfs2_commit_trans(handle);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-04 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-01 23:52 [PATCH 00/28] Mount writer count and read-only bind mounts (v5) Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 01/28] prepare for write access checks: collapse if() Dave Hansen
2006-08-03 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 02/28] r/o bind mount prepwork: move open_namei()'s vfs_create() Dave Hansen
2006-08-03 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 03/28] unlink: monitor i_nlink Dave Hansen
2006-08-03 14:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 04/28] OCFS2 is screwy Dave Hansen
2006-08-02 2:14 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-08-02 3:19 ` [PATCH 04/28] OCFS2 is (not) screwy Dave Hansen
2006-08-02 3:21 ` [PATCH 04/28] OCFS2 is screwy Dave Hansen
2006-08-02 4:34 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-08-03 0:20 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-08-04 21:01 ` [PATCH] clean up OCFS2 nlink handling Dave Hansen
2006-08-04 21:38 ` Mark Fasheh [this message]
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 05/28] monitor zeroing of i_nlink Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 06/28] reintroduce list of vfsmounts over superblock Dave Hansen
2006-08-03 14:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-04 21:47 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 07/28] Add vfsmount writer count Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 08/28] record when sb_writer_count elevated for inode Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 09/28] kill open files traverse on remount ro Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 10/28] increment sb writer count when nlink hits zero Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 11/28] elevate writer count for chown and friends Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 12/28] elevate mnt writers for callers of vfs_mkdir() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 13/28] elevate write count during entire ncp_ioctl() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 14/28] sys_symlinkat() elevate write count around vfs_symlink() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 15/28] elevate mount count for extended attributes Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 16/28] sys_linkat(): elevate write count around vfs_link() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 18/28] unix_find_other() elevate write count for touch_atime() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 17/28] mount_is_safe(): add comment Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 19/28] elevate write count over calls to vfs_rename() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 20/28] tricky: elevate write count files are open()ed Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 21/28] elevate writer count for do_sys_truncate() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 22/28] elevate write count for do_utimes() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 23/28] elevate write count for do_sys_utime() and touch_atime() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 24/28] sys_mknodat(): elevate write count for vfs_mknod/create() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 25/28] elevate mnt writers for vfs_unlink() callers Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 26/28] do_rmdir(): elevate write count Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:53 ` [PATCH 27/28] elevate writer count for custom 'struct file' Dave Hansen
2006-08-03 14:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-11 20:31 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:53 ` [PATCH 28/28] honor r/w changes at do_remount() time Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060804213856.GP29686@ca-server1.us.oracle.com \
--to=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.