From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-g3b445eea BUG: warning at /usr/src/linux-git/kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug()
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:31:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060805003142.GH18792@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060804222400.GC18792@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:24:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > DaveJ, any ideas?
>
> So I'm at a loss to explain why this made this bug suddenly appear, but
> I don't think this is anything new. Fixing it however...
> I'm looking at it, but I don't see anything obvious yet.
Ok, debugging this is getting ridiculous. I dug out a core duo,
built a kernel and watched it spontaneously reboot before it even got to init.
Digging out a serial cable yielded this gem:
Dentry cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 7, 524288 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
Memory: 1020104k/1047108k available (2082k kernel code, 26324k reserved, 1107k data, 240k init, 129604k highmem)
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
---------------------------------------------
swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
(cpu_bitmask_lock){--..}, at: [<c0304e9c>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
but task is already holding lock:
(cpu_bitmask_lock){--..}, at: [<c0304e9c>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by swapper/0:
#0: (cpu_bitmask_lock){--..}, at: [<c0304e9c>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
stack backtrace:
[<c0104edc>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x152
[<c01054c2>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
[<c01055db>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[<c013ae05>] __lock_acquire+0x74f/0x96d
[<c013b566>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6d
[<c0304d35>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb0/0x1f6
[<c0304e9c>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
[<c013e8d4>] lock_cpu_hotplug+0x4a/0x4c
[<c016bed3>] kmem_cache_create+0x61/0x577
[<c04af5a1>] kmem_cache_init+0x177/0x38c
[<c049c5f3>] start_kernel+0x221/0x3b3
[<c0100210>] 0xc0100210
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at 0xc0100210
Leftover inexact backtrace:
=======================
=======================
=======================
bad: scheduling from the idle thread!
[<c0104edc>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x152
[<c01054c2>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
[<c01055db>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[<c03035a6>] schedule+0xa6/0x9d3
[<c0304d95>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x110/0x1f6
[<c0304e9c>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
[<c013e8d4>] lock_cpu_hotplug+0x4a/0x4c
[<c016bed3>] kmem_cache_create+0x61/0x577
[<c04af5a1>] kmem_cache_init+0x177/0x38c
[<c049c5f3>] start_kernel+0x221/0x3b3
[<c0100210>] 0xc0100210
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at 0xc0100210
Leftover inexact backtrace:
=======================
=======================
=======================
<Insert reboot here>
Waaaay before cpufreq even enters the picture.
Sigh.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-05 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-04 19:04 2.6.18-rc3-g3b445eea BUG: warning at /usr/src/linux-git/kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug() Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-04 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-08-04 22:24 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 0:31 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-08-05 2:10 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 2:23 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 2:49 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 6:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 7:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-05 19:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-06 1:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-05 10:54 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-05 11:11 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-05 11:26 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-05 18:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 21:15 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-06 16:59 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-06 18:05 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-06 19:32 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-07 1:26 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 8:18 ` Jan Beulich
2006-08-15 12:23 ` Jan Beulich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-05 22:14 art
2006-08-06 1:23 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060805003142.GH18792@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.