From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
To: John Anderson <johnha@ccbill.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Xen API/libvirt & Remote
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 04:27:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060805082748.GL4461@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A7F39817EC2477418A3AA053E69F835A3AA0FC@Exchange.ccbill-hq.local>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:09:44AM -0700, John Anderson wrote:
> I'm guessing that in the future, libvirt will handle the network
> transport & authentication tasks I'm using gSOAP for currently. When
> that happens it would be nice to have an SSL certificate authentication
> mechanism.
I'm still wondering honnestly. There is so many way to do remote access
(custom protocol, XML-RPC, SOAP,CORBA, ...) and I would expect each
'customer' to have his own type of deployed framework already, so I'm not
sure adding one kind of remote access capability would hit the 80/20 sweet
spot. It would also make things more complex (need for a daemon etc. though
there is already one for the proxy mode). I would also expect each deployment
to have it's own preferred authentication method which may vary greatly
depending on how and why they use virtualization (LDAP, SSH, etc...). Basically
the matrix of capabilities explodes and unless going though a very versatile
(plugin again) interface, hardcoding one may not be usable to most users.
Maybe when we have more deployment and more use case feedback then it
should be considered more seriously, in the meantime explaining how things
could be done is probably the best approach.
Feedback welcome :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-05 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-04 18:09 Xen API/libvirt & Remote John Anderson
2006-08-05 8:27 ` Daniel Veillard [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-03 17:14 John Anderson
2006-08-04 13:46 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2006-08-02 23:28 John Anderson
2006-08-03 8:45 ` Daniel Veillard
2006-08-08 21:41 ` Ewan Mellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060805082748.GL4461@redhat.com \
--to=veillard@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=johnha@ccbill.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.