From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: ext3 vs reiserfs speed (was Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion))
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:56:02 +0000
Message-ID: <20060807215602.GA4540@ucw.cz>
References: <200607281402.k6SE245v004715@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <44CA31D2.70203@slaphack.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607280859380.4168@g5.osdl.org> <44C9FB93.9040201@namesys.com> <44CA6905.4050002@slaphack.com> <44CA126C.7050403@namesys.com> <44CA98F9.1040900@garzik.org> <44CAD3FF.8060203@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-29535-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44CAD3FF.8060203@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Hi!

> > Using guilt as an argument in a technical discussion is a flashing red
> > sign that says "I have no technical rebuttal"
> 
> Wow, that is really nervy.  Let's recap this all:
> 
> * reiser4 has a 2x performance advantage over the next fastest FS
> (ext3), and when compression ships in a month that will double again as
> well as save space.  See http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks.html, and

Does that mean that ext3 is faster than reiser3? Wow, that would be
good reason to switch default filesystem to ext3 (or reiser4?) in next
suse release.
							Pavel
-- 
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.