From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Pietikainen Subject: Re: airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage. Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:38:51 +0300 Message-ID: <20060808113851.GA17861@ee.oulu.fi> References: <20060808094410.GA29313@ee.oulu.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ee.oulu.fi ([130.231.61.23]:62205 "EHLO ee.oulu.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964861AbWHHLjC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:39:02 -0400 To: Herbert Xu Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:16:13PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Pekka Pietikainen wrote: > > Only aironet lockdep related report I could find was > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115406279721287&w=2 > > > > this looks a bit different: > > > > Linux version 2.6.17-1.2528.fc6 (brewbuilder@hs20-bc2-2.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 4.1.1 20060802 (Red Hat 4.1.1-14)) #1 SMP Sun Aug 6 01:43:42 EDT 2006 > > If you run the latest upstream kernel this warning will disappear > as different skb queues no have different lock keys. Hmm... I retried with a 2.6.18rc4-based rawhide kernel and the warning is still there, previous one was rc3-git7. Could be http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115461336523555&w=2 which isn't upstream yet, right?