From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Giles Subject: Re: ipt_time time match invalid size Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:30:23 -0600 Message-ID: <200608100030.23683.jgiles@windowsproof.com> References: <001201c6bc3b$1f60fca0$0101000a@tanjian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <001201c6bc3b$1f60fca0$0101000a@tanjian> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Wednesday 09 August 2006 11:09 pm, Rob Sterenborg wrote: > > I finally figured out what I was doing wrong with the P-O-M and the > > time module. > > > > Now, after installing the proper modules and running the following > > iptables command: > > IPTABLES = path to iptables > > $IPTABLES -A INPUT -s 192.168.15.131 -m time --timestart > > 17:05 --timestop 17:20 --days Wed -j RULE_2 > > $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -s 192.168.15.131 -m time --timestart > > 17:05 --timestop 17:20 --days Wed -j RULE_2 > > > > (This was just a test script to see how it worked) > > > > It doesn't work and I get this error executing the command from > > within my script: > > > > iptables: Unknown error 4294967295 > > iptables: Unknown error 4294967295 > > > > And, I get this output in dmesg: > > > > ip_tables: time match: invalid size 0 != 16 > > ip_tables: time match: invalid size 0 != 16 > > > > > > I used the 20060706 of p-o-m-ng and am using the 2.6.17.8 > > kernel. The 20060706 version of p-o-m is the latest with the > > time module in it and it compiles just fine with the kernel. > > > > Does anyone know how I can resolve this issue? > > Did you also recompile iptables? > > > Gr, > Rob Thanks for the reply... I found out that there was some API changes in the 2.6.17 kernel that prevent it from working properly. I downgraded to a 2.6.15 kernel and it is working as planned. Thanks for the reply... I will wait for the maintainers to update via p-o-m at a later date... Joe