From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GB242-0008DB-5C for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:22:34 -0700 Received: from [198.99.130.12] (helo=saraswathi.solana.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1GB240-0003M4-MN for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:22:34 -0700 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:22:16 -0400 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20060810042216.GA7754@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200608091815.k79IFQVB005310@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060810020922.GO6908@waste.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060810020922.GO6908@waste.org> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - support checkstack List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Matt Mackall Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Joern Engel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture > > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl. > > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager? SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager. > > Or should we just get together a small fund to send the remaining > Voyager users proper computers? Yeah, that's a plan :-) Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161012AbWHJEWo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:22:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161018AbWHJEWo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:22:44 -0400 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]:4062 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161012AbWHJEWn (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:22:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:22:16 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Matt Mackall Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Joern Engel Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack Message-ID: <20060810042216.GA7754@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200608091815.k79IFQVB005310@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060810020922.GO6908@waste.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060810020922.GO6908@waste.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture > > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl. > > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager? SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager. > > Or should we just get together a small fund to send the remaining > Voyager users proper computers? Yeah, that's a plan :-) Jeff