From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Xin Zhao <uszhaoxin@gmail.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Urgent help needed on an NFS question, please help!!!
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:11:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060810161107.GC4379@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ae3c140608100815p57c0378kfd316a482738ee83@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:15:57AM -0400, Xin Zhao wrote:
> I am considering another possibility: suppose client C1 does lookup()
> on file X and gets a file handle, which include inode number,
> generation number and parent's inode number. Before C1 issues
> getattr(), C2 move the parent directory to a different place, which
> will not change the parent's inode number, neither the file X's inode,
> i_generation. So when C1 issues a getattr() request with this file
> handle, the server seems to have no way to detect that file X is not
> existent at the original path. Instead, the server will returns the
> moved X's attributes, which are correct, but semantically wrong. Is
> there any way that server deal with this problem?
It isn't semantically wrong. There is no way for the application to
distinguish between the events:
open()
stat()
mv
and
open()
mv
stat()
As long as the results are consistent with the former case, it doesn't
matter if the latter case actually happened.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-10 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-10 5:04 Urgent help needed on an NFS question, please help!!! Xin Zhao
2006-08-10 5:11 ` Neil Brown
2006-08-10 5:54 ` Xin Zhao
2006-08-10 6:03 ` Neil Brown
2006-08-10 15:15 ` Xin Zhao
2006-08-10 16:11 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2006-08-10 16:23 ` Xin Zhao
2006-08-10 16:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-08-10 17:08 ` Xin Zhao
2006-08-10 17:38 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-08-10 17:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-08-10 18:02 ` Xin Zhao
2006-08-10 19:59 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-08-10 22:25 ` Xin Zhao
2006-08-11 0:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-08-10 22:28 ` Xin Zhao
2006-08-11 0:38 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-08-10 23:42 ` Bryan Henderson
2006-08-10 17:50 ` Bryan Henderson
2006-08-10 18:15 ` Xin Zhao
2006-08-11 0:07 ` Bryan Henderson
2006-08-10 21:00 ` Peter Staubach
2006-08-10 6:04 ` Xin Zhao
2006-08-10 6:15 ` Xin Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060810161107.GC4379@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=uszhaoxin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.