From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GBDgU-0005YN-3c for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:02 -0700 Received: from waste.org ([66.93.16.53]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1GBDgS-00053L-Lv for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:02 -0700 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:45:48 -0500 From: Matt Mackall Message-ID: <20060810164548.GS6908@waste.org> References: <200608091815.k79IFQVB005310@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060810020922.GO6908@waste.org> <20060810042216.GA7754@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060810042216.GA7754@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - support checkstack List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jeff Dike Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Joern Engel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:22:16AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture > > > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl. > > > > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager? > > SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, > host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager. Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside checkstack. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161446AbWHJQrI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:47:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161441AbWHJQrI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:47:08 -0400 Received: from waste.org ([66.93.16.53]:56987 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161423AbWHJQrG (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:47:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:45:48 -0500 From: Matt Mackall To: Jeff Dike Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Joern Engel Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack Message-ID: <20060810164548.GS6908@waste.org> References: <200608091815.k79IFQVB005310@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060810020922.GO6908@waste.org> <20060810042216.GA7754@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060810042216.GA7754@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:22:16AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture > > > name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl. > > > > Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager? > > SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying, > host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager. Right, so it sounds like this breaks Voyager. Which I think means we ought to pass ARCH and SUBARCH and do the right thing inside checkstack. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.