All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Thomas Koeller <thomas@koeller.dyndns.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	wim@iguana.be, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added MIPS RM9K watchdog driver
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 23:41:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060812224100.GA9043@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608121806.02844.thomas@koeller.dyndns.org>

On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 06:06:02PM +0200, Thomas Koeller wrote:

> > > +	while (1) continue;
> >
> > cpu_relax();
> 
> I tried to find out about the purpose of cpu_relax(). On MIPS, at least,
> it maps to barrier(). I do not quite understand why I would need a
> barrier() in this place. Would you, or someone else, care to
> enlighten me?

Busy wait loops are meant to be filled with cpu_relax() in Linux.  On
processors like the Pentium 4 this expands into something that keeps
the CPU from consuming excessive amounts of energy for just twiddling
thumbs and probably also CPU dependant.  On MIPS cpu_relax() so far is
meaningless and therfore just defined as barrier().

  Ralf

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-12 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-10 21:19 [PATCH] Added MIPS RM9K watchdog driver thomas
2006-08-11 20:07 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-12 16:06   ` Thomas Koeller
2006-08-12 22:41     ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2006-08-12 17:45   ` Thomas Koeller
2006-08-12 20:43     ` Alan Cox
2006-08-11 20:56 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-11 23:49   ` Thomas Koeller
2006-08-11 22:06     ` Oleg Verych
2006-08-11 22:06       ` Oleg Verych
2006-08-12  0:06     ` Dave Jones
2006-08-12  0:22       ` Ralf Baechle
2006-08-14 14:14     ` Joseph Fannin
2006-08-14 15:30       ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-08-14 16:21         ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-08-14 16:26           ` Dave Jones
2006-08-14 16:27           ` Roland Dreier
2006-08-14 15:50     ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2006-08-14 19:55       ` [PATCH] " Thomas Koeller
2006-08-14 17:25 ` [PATCH] Added " Luca
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-01 18:46 Wim Van Sebroeck
2006-11-01 18:50 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-11-01 19:11   ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2006-11-01 20:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-11-02  6:11 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-11-02 14:04   ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060812224100.GA9043@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=thomas@koeller.dyndns.org \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.