All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: module compiler version check still needed?
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:19:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608141119.46259.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1155546377.2886.190.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

On Monday 14 August 2006 11:06, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 06:48 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Does anybody know of any reason why we would still need the compiler version
> > check during module loading? AFAIK on i386 it was only needed to handle
> > 2.95 (which got dropped) and on x86-64 it was never needed. Is there
> > a need on any other architecture for it?
> 
> is there any harm in doing this check?

Yes, it can cause lots of trouble when you try to compile external
modules on a different system with different compiler than on the
system where the kernel was compiled.

e.g. you upgrade a distribution kernel but now you can compile
modules for it because the new rpm was compiled with a newer 
compiler.

Happens to me regularly.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-14  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-13  4:48 module compiler version check still needed? Andi Kleen
2006-08-13  4:59 ` Keith Owens
2006-08-13 20:27   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-13 22:04     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-13 22:14     ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-08-14  4:59       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-14  5:38         ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-08-14  5:45           ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-14  9:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-14  9:19   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-08-14 22:11     ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200608141119.46259.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.