From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:00:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060815010020.GA14251@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060814234801.GK30814@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 07:48:01PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> This adds a whole bunch of new code, and doesn't seem to make any
> existing code any simpler (to me at least). From a cpufreq point of view,
> what does adding this buy us? What problem do we have today that is
> being solved by all this?
>
> Every explanation of powerop I've seen so far dives into microdetails,
> whilst the 10,000ft view has always passed me by other than "this is
> what we've had in the embedded world".
>
> The diagram at http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2006-August/003196.html
> also confuses me. I was under the impression that powerop was adding additional
> userspace interfaces. If we're not changing how things from a userspace
> point of view, we're churning a lot of kernel code,.. why?
>
> Clue me in here, I'm feeling thick.
You're not alone, I really don't get it either.
But I guess we'll just wait for the next round of unified patches and
then go from there.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-15 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-14 20:07 So, what's the status on the recent patches here? Greg KH
2006-08-14 22:24 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-14 22:46 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-14 23:24 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-14 23:48 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-15 1:00 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-08-15 3:03 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-15 10:35 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-15 19:04 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-16 12:58 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-17 21:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 10:02 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-18 15:29 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-08-18 17:54 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-18 21:05 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-08-20 13:19 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-17 5:20 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-17 7:20 ` Paul Mundt
2006-08-17 9:18 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-17 21:40 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 5:42 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-23 12:28 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-23 15:26 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-24 12:58 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-25 19:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 23:26 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-26 10:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-26 13:30 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-26 13:46 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-28 16:40 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-28 17:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 7:51 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 22:13 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-30 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 11:48 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-24 7:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-30 11:00 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-30 22:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-31 13:44 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-02 11:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-17 21:24 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-19 6:10 ` David Singleton
2006-08-22 2:13 ` Greg KH
2006-08-22 5:20 ` David Singleton
2006-08-23 19:05 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-24 12:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-19 6:19 ` David Singleton
[not found] ` <20060819184843.GB15644@redhat.com>
2006-08-20 3:20 ` David Singleton
2006-08-20 3:30 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-23 18:50 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-27 4:37 ` David Singleton
2006-08-27 15:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 15:55 ` David Singleton
2006-08-29 16:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 17:49 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 6:20 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 13:26 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-31 0:22 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-31 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-02 18:05 ` David Singleton
2006-09-02 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 16:25 ` David Singleton
2006-09-03 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 21:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-09 0:39 ` David Singleton
2006-09-09 0:48 ` David Singleton
2006-09-09 16:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-09 12:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 15:11 ` David Singleton
2006-09-11 17:14 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 18:58 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 4:52 ` David Singleton
2006-08-30 5:52 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 13:39 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-27 19:48 ` Greg KH
2006-08-28 0:07 ` David Singleton
2006-08-27 20:54 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-28 22:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 21:46 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-29 1:29 ` David Singleton
2006-08-29 22:39 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-31 13:27 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-31 19:22 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-01 8:11 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-14 23:29 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-08-14 23:48 ` Matthew Locke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-16 1:27 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-16 15:25 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-20 13:36 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-23 19:20 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-24 8:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-24 12:16 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-24 12:29 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-24 14:52 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 19:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 20:05 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 20:08 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 20:22 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 20:34 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 21:27 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 21:46 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 22:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-26 2:21 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 20:57 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 21:13 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 21:21 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 21:42 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 22:11 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-31 0:52 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-31 2:41 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-31 15:14 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-01 14:49 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:21 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 21:34 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 22:12 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 22:25 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:31 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 22:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:40 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 16:45 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-06 10:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 23:00 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 10:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 23:05 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-04 15:43 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-05 16:03 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-05 20:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-06 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060815010020.GA14251@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.