From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030450AbWHOSdt (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:33:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030280AbWHOSds (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:33:48 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:22156 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030450AbWHOSdr (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:33:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:33:43 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: The rest of my proc cleanup. Message-Id: <20060815113343.69529c02.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org These patches seem ok to me: 1) in their trivial impact on cpusets, and 2) as a good cleanup. Perhaps others wiser (more seniority in the school of hard knocks) will see problems with them. I don't. Thanks. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401