From: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
To: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] multiple cpumask and vcpu-pin all keyword
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:12:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060816211247.GA1694@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060816210544.GZ1694@us.ibm.com>
* Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com> [2006-08-16 16:06]:
> * Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> [2006-08-16 16:03]:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:49:34PM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> > > This series of patches relates to the cpus parameter and pinning vcpus.
> > > The first patch is a clean-up of getVcpuInfo, which previously only
> > > returned the vcpu to cpu mapping. This was insufficient for extracting
> > > affinity information. The patch extends getVcpuInfo to return a dict of
> > > all the fields in xm vcpu-list for a domain. It also fixes a couple
> > > users of the function and moves them to a new vcpu_to_cpu function which
> > > retains the old behavior of getVcpuInfo.
> >
> > How is that affecting the xend sxp API ? This may break libvirt 0.1.4
> > which uses those.
The cpus parameter and vcpu 'all' changes add new behavior and do not
modify any existing behavior, so no changes to the sxp API.
>
> This change is to XmTestLib, ie, for the test cases only. Sorry for not
> being more clear on that.
I misread your question, but the above was referring to the getVcpuInfo
change, which was in XmTestLib.
>
> --
> Ryan Harper
> Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
> IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
> (512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
> ryanh@us.ibm.com
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-16 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-16 20:49 [PATCH 0 of 5] multiple cpumask and vcpu-pin all keyword Ryan Harper
2006-08-16 20:49 ` [PATCH 1 of 5] Change getVcpuInfo to return more information Ryan Harper
2006-08-16 20:49 ` [PATCH 2 of 5] Add support for specifying multi cpumasks in cpus parameter Ryan Harper
2006-08-16 20:49 ` [PATCH 3 of 5] Add testcase for multi-cpumask " Ryan Harper
2006-08-16 20:49 ` [PATCH 4 of 5] Add keyword 'all' to vcpu-pin Ryan Harper
2006-08-16 20:49 ` [PATCH 5 of 5] Add testcase for vcpu-pin all Ryan Harper
2006-08-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 0 of 5] multiple cpumask and vcpu-pin all keyword Daniel Veillard
2006-08-16 21:05 ` Ryan Harper
2006-08-16 21:12 ` Ryan Harper [this message]
2006-08-16 21:22 ` Daniel Veillard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060816211247.GA1694@us.ibm.com \
--to=ryanh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=veillard@redhat.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.