From: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/14] ipw2200: enable wireless extension passive scan
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:39:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060821033903.GA5434@mail.intel.com> (raw)
This patch enables the ipw2200 driver to support passive scanning as
offered by the wireless extensions. For this, I enhanced the ipw_wx_set_scan
function in such a way that it differentiates between a passive and an
active scan request. Additionally, I added a new function called
ipw_request_passive_scan that is similiar to the ipw_request_scan
function to perform passive scans. Last but not least, I added a field
(in fact it is a work_struct struct) called request_passive_scan to
the ipw_priv struct.
Signed-off-by: Thomas King <king@informatik.uni-mannheim.de>
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
58fb625939741d4ba2cbd660c1723f49ebe1b9f1
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.c
index 1525830..ea14b55 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.c
@@ -6169,7 +6169,7 @@ static void ipw_add_scan_channels(struct
}
}
-static int ipw_request_scan(struct ipw_priv *priv)
+static int ipw_request_scan_helper(struct ipw_priv *priv, int type)
{
struct ipw_scan_request_ext scan;
int err = 0, scan_type;
@@ -6200,19 +6200,29 @@ static int ipw_request_scan(struct ipw_p
}
memset(&scan, 0, sizeof(scan));
+ scan.full_scan_index = cpu_to_le32(ieee80211_get_scans(priv->ieee));
- if (priv->config & CFG_SPEED_SCAN)
+ if (type == IW_SCAN_TYPE_PASSIVE) {
+ IPW_DEBUG_WX("use passive scanning\n");
+ scan_type = IPW_SCAN_PASSIVE_FULL_DWELL_SCAN;
+ scan.dwell_time[IPW_SCAN_PASSIVE_FULL_DWELL_SCAN] =
+ cpu_to_le16(120);
+ ipw_add_scan_channels(priv, &scan, scan_type);
+ goto send_request;
+ }
+
+ /* Use active scan by default. */
+ if (priv->config & CFG_SPEED_SCAN)
scan.dwell_time[IPW_SCAN_ACTIVE_BROADCAST_SCAN] =
- cpu_to_le16(30);
+ cpu_to_le16(30);
else
scan.dwell_time[IPW_SCAN_ACTIVE_BROADCAST_SCAN] =
- cpu_to_le16(20);
+ cpu_to_le16(20);
scan.dwell_time[IPW_SCAN_ACTIVE_BROADCAST_AND_DIRECT_SCAN] =
- cpu_to_le16(20);
- scan.dwell_time[IPW_SCAN_PASSIVE_FULL_DWELL_SCAN] = cpu_to_le16(120);
+ cpu_to_le16(20);
- scan.full_scan_index = cpu_to_le32(ieee80211_get_scans(priv->ieee));
+ scan.dwell_time[IPW_SCAN_PASSIVE_FULL_DWELL_SCAN] = cpu_to_le16(120);
#ifdef CONFIG_IPW2200_MONITOR
if (priv->ieee->iw_mode == IW_MODE_MONITOR) {
@@ -6249,7 +6259,7 @@ static int ipw_request_scan(struct ipw_p
*
* TODO: Move SPEED SCAN support to all modes and bands */
scan.dwell_time[IPW_SCAN_PASSIVE_FULL_DWELL_SCAN] =
- cpu_to_le16(2000);
+ cpu_to_le16(2000);
} else {
#endif /* CONFIG_IPW2200_MONITOR */
/* If we are roaming, then make this a directed scan for the
@@ -6275,6 +6285,7 @@ static int ipw_request_scan(struct ipw_p
}
#endif
+send_request:
err = ipw_send_scan_request_ext(priv, &scan);
if (err) {
IPW_DEBUG_HC("Sending scan command failed: %08X\n", err);
@@ -6285,11 +6296,19 @@ static int ipw_request_scan(struct ipw_p
priv->status &= ~STATUS_SCAN_PENDING;
queue_delayed_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan_check,
IPW_SCAN_CHECK_WATCHDOG);
- done:
+done:
mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
return err;
}
+static int ipw_request_passive_scan(struct ipw_priv *priv) {
+ return ipw_request_scan_helper(priv, IW_SCAN_TYPE_PASSIVE);
+}
+
+static int ipw_request_scan(struct ipw_priv *priv) {
+ return ipw_request_scan_helper(priv, IW_SCAN_TYPE_ACTIVE);
+}
+
static void ipw_bg_abort_scan(void *data)
{
struct ipw_priv *priv = data;
@@ -9378,15 +9397,19 @@ static int ipw_wx_set_scan(struct net_de
union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra)
{
struct ipw_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
- struct iw_scan_req *req = NULL;
- if (wrqu->data.length
- && wrqu->data.length == sizeof(struct iw_scan_req)) {
- req = (struct iw_scan_req *)extra;
+ struct iw_scan_req *req = (struct iw_scan_req *)extra;
+
+ if (wrqu->data.length == sizeof(struct iw_scan_req)) {
if (wrqu->data.flags & IW_SCAN_THIS_ESSID) {
ipw_request_direct_scan(priv, req->essid,
req->essid_len);
return 0;
}
+ if (req->scan_type == IW_SCAN_TYPE_PASSIVE) {
+ queue_work(priv->workqueue,
+ &priv->request_passive_scan);
+ return 0;
+ }
}
IPW_DEBUG_WX("Start scan\n");
@@ -10618,6 +10641,8 @@ static int ipw_setup_deferred_work(struc
INIT_WORK(&priv->down, (void (*)(void *))ipw_bg_down, priv);
INIT_WORK(&priv->request_scan,
(void (*)(void *))ipw_request_scan, priv);
+ INIT_WORK(&priv->request_passive_scan,
+ (void (*)(void *))ipw_request_passive_scan, priv);
INIT_WORK(&priv->gather_stats,
(void (*)(void *))ipw_bg_gather_stats, priv);
INIT_WORK(&priv->abort_scan, (void (*)(void *))ipw_bg_abort_scan, priv);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.h
index a1df67f..dad5eed 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.h
@@ -1296,6 +1296,7 @@ struct ipw_priv {
struct work_struct system_config;
struct work_struct rx_replenish;
struct work_struct request_scan;
+ struct work_struct request_passive_scan;
struct work_struct adapter_restart;
struct work_struct rf_kill;
struct work_struct up;
--
1.2.6
reply other threads:[~2006-08-21 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060821033903.GA5434@mail.intel.com \
--to=yi.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.