From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Natalie.Protasevich@unisys.com
Subject: Re: Freeing ACPI tables after parsing
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:52:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608211752.16616.len.brown@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608211146.53379.ak@suse.de>
On Monday 21 August 2006 05:46, Andi Kleen wrote:
> [repost, this time with correct cc list]
>
> AFAIK ACPI saves all information found in ACPI tables in memory
> somewhere else (please correct me if I'm wrong on that)
>
> I also found this comment in e820.h:
>
> #define E820_ACPI 3 /* usable as RAM once ACPI tables have been read */
>
> Currently I don't see any code that would free the ACPI tables after they
> are read.
This is true.
> During SLES10 testing we had some problems with the ACPI
> tables on some Unisys systems being in a area where the kexec kernel
> wanted to be loaded too.
Why does the kexec kernel care what physical memory it is loaded into,
and how can it be guaranteed that address is not reserved by the platform firmware?
> Also on other systems the ACPI tables are not
> exactly at the end but in the middle of the memory map and for some applications
> it might be better to have a lot of physical continuous memory.
>
> So are there any plans to free the BIOS supplied ACPI tables after parsing
> or is there some obstacle to that that I'm missing?
As Alexey wrote, he and Bob have already deleted the kernel's new copy
of the tables in favor of using them 'in place'.
I guess I'm not clear on the requirement here.
If we were to alter that plan to make a kernel copy -- and release the original BIOS memory --
assuming it is marked such that we can release it -- how do we know that
we are not dropping the new copy someplace that kexec doesn't want it?
-Len
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-21 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-21 9:46 Freeing ACPI tables after parsing Andi Kleen
2006-08-21 16:59 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-08-21 20:03 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-21 21:52 ` Len Brown [this message]
2006-08-21 22:06 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-21 22:22 ` Len Brown
2006-08-21 22:26 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-22 10:00 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-22 20:28 Moore, Robert
2006-08-23 8:18 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200608211752.16616.len.brown@intel.com \
--to=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=Natalie.Protasevich@unisys.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.