From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFHlI-0007Ae-BP for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:56:48 -0700 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]) by mail.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1GFHlG-0000mm-P6 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:56:48 -0700 Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:56:41 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk Message-ID: <20060821215641.GQ11651@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [uml-devel] arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S: useless #ifdef _REGPARM's? List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: jdike@karaya.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S contains two #ifdef _REGPARM's. Even if regparm was used in i386 uml (which isn't currently done (why?)), I don't see _REGPARM being defined anywhere. Is this a bug waiting for happening when regparm will be used on uml or do I miss anything? cu Adrian -- Gentoo kernels are 42 times more popular than SUSE kernels among KLive users (a service by SUSE contractor Andrea Arcangeli that gathers data about kernels from many users worldwide). There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics. Benjamin Disraeli ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751222AbWHUV4m (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:56:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751225AbWHUV4m (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:56:42 -0400 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:55566 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751222AbWHUV4l (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:56:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:56:41 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: jdike@karaya.com Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S: useless #ifdef _REGPARM's? Message-ID: <20060821215641.GQ11651@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S contains two #ifdef _REGPARM's. Even if regparm was used in i386 uml (which isn't currently done (why?)), I don't see _REGPARM being defined anywhere. Is this a bug waiting for happening when regparm will be used on uml or do I miss anything? cu Adrian -- Gentoo kernels are 42 times more popular than SUSE kernels among KLive users (a service by SUSE contractor Andrea Arcangeli that gathers data about kernels from many users worldwide). There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics. Benjamin Disraeli