From: Massimiliano Hofer <max@nucleus.it>
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: new ABI
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:19:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608232319.22120.max@nucleus.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44EC991F.7020909@anduras.de>
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 8:06 pm, Sven Anders wrote:
> > The real question thus becomes: is it worh to restart from (almost)
> > scratch?
>
> In my personal opinion it's time for a new API.
> During the implementation of my program, I run into many problems which
> could only be solved clearly by a new API. It would make the implementation
> of other user-space programs (beside iptables) much easier.
Do you mean ABI?
> I would love to have unique rule ids! 8-)
Would a number be sufficient, or do you think a user supplied string would be
much more useful? Of course the kernel will assign default ids to id-less
rules.
> I think this could be done with little changes on the current netfilter
> core too, but it would be better to do it in a new framework. You only have
> to distinguish between VERIDICT and NON-VERDICT targets.
The current data structures will be completely wiped away. This isn't a little
change and will need a lot of testing.
> - A NOT for all matches
If we implement boolean expressions a NOT won't be the least bit difficult.
--
Saluti,
Massimiliano Hofer
Nucleus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-23 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-14 21:12 new ABI Massimiliano Hofer
2006-08-15 0:00 ` Joakim Axelsson
2006-08-15 8:39 ` Amin Azez
2006-08-15 22:08 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-08-15 12:14 ` Simon Lodal
2006-08-15 22:57 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-08-18 14:14 ` Simon Lodal
2006-08-18 21:40 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-08-18 14:50 ` Amin Azez
2006-08-23 18:06 ` Sven Anders
2006-08-23 21:19 ` Massimiliano Hofer [this message]
2006-08-24 7:57 ` Sven Anders
2006-08-16 12:16 ` Joakim Axelsson
2006-08-16 12:29 ` Joakim Axelsson
2006-08-16 14:40 ` Joakim Axelsson
2006-08-18 13:06 ` Simon Lodal
2006-08-18 21:40 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-08-18 22:24 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-08-22 8:46 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-08-23 5:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-08-23 13:48 ` Joakim Axelsson
2006-08-24 9:20 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-08-24 13:48 ` Joakim Axelsson
2006-08-24 8:50 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-08-24 10:58 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-08-24 11:22 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-08-24 13:13 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-08-24 16:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-08-23 21:13 ` Massimiliano Hofer
2006-08-24 10:15 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2006-09-04 22:26 ` Massimiliano Hofer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200608232319.22120.max@nucleus.it \
--to=max@nucleus.it \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.