From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] maximum latency tracking infrastructure
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:24:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060824222417.GA27504@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1156441295.3014.75.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 07:41:35PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> + /* the ipw2100 hardware really doesn't want power management delays
> + * longer than 500usec
> + */
> + modify_acceptable_latency("ipw2100", 500);
> +
Hm. My BIOS claims that the C3 transition period is 85usec (and even my
C4 is 185) , but I've hit the error path where C3 gets disabled. Is this
really adequate? Also, by the looks of it, the C3 disabling path is
still present - is it still theoretically necessary with the above, or
is this just a belt and braces approach?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-24 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 17:41 [RFC] maximum latency tracking infrastructure Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-24 19:18 ` Len Brown
2006-08-24 21:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-08-24 21:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-24 21:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-08-24 21:50 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-25 4:54 ` Nick Piggin
2006-08-25 7:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-25 8:26 ` Nick Piggin
2006-08-25 8:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-24 21:52 ` Daniel Walker
2006-08-24 21:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-24 22:16 ` Daniel Walker
2006-08-24 22:24 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2006-08-25 8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-24 22:52 ` Matt Mackall
2006-08-25 7:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-25 14:54 ` Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060824222417.GA27504@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.