From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: exclude's effect with multiple rules
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:50:40 -0400
Message-ID: <200608252050.41324.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <44EF73F9.1010700@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <44EF73F9.1010700@us.ibm.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Friday 25 August 2006 18:04, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> So if I have the following two rules, what should be expected behaviour?
>
> auditctl -a entry,always -S chmod
> auditctl -a exclude,always -S all

The expected behavior is that rule 1 is accepted and rule 2 produces an error 
and is rejected.

-Steve