All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:01:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608271801.44774.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060827084417.918992193@goop.org>


Very cool.

> - Make it work.  It works UP on a test QEMU machine, but it doesn't
>   yet work on real hardware, or SMP (though not working SMP on QEMU is
>   more likely to be a QEMU problem).  Not sure what the problem is yet;
>   I'm hoping review will reveal something.

I bet qemu doesn't have a real descriptor cache unlike real CPUs.
So likely it is some disconnect between changing the backing GDT
and referencing the register. Reload %gs more aggressively?

Comparing with SimNow! (which should behave more like a real CPU)
might be also interesting.

> - Measure performance impact.  The patch adds a segment register
>   save/restore on entry/exit to the kernel.  This expense should be
>   offset by savings in using the PDA while in the kernel, but I haven't
>   measured this yet.  Space savings are already appealing though.
> - Modify more things to use the PDA.  The more that uses it, the more
>   the cost of the %gs save/restore is amortized.  smp_processor_id and
>   current are the obvious first choices, which are implemented in this
>   series.

per cpu data would be the prime candidate. It is pretty simple.

> - Make it a config option?  UP systems don't need to do any of this,
>   other than having a single pre-allocated PDA.  Unfortunately, it gets
>   a bit messy to do this given the changes needed in handling %gs.

Please don't.

(weak point:)

- The stack protector code might work one day on i386 too.

-Andi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-27 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-27  8:44 [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] Basic definitions for i386-pda Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] Initialize the per-CPU data area Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] Use %gs as the PDA base-segment in the kernel Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  9:49   ` Keith Owens
2006-08-27 10:01     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 15:57   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 16:36     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 17:20     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 18:19       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 20:03         ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-27 23:38         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-28  9:51         ` Jan Beulich
2006-08-28 14:54           ` H. J. Lu
2006-08-28 17:24         ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] Fix places where using %gs changes the usermode ABI Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 15:59   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 16:37     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] Implement smp_processor_id() with the PDA Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  8:44 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] Implement "current" " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 16:01   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 16:38     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27  9:47 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386 Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-27 16:46   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 17:44     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-27 18:07       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 18:27         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 16:01 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-08-27 16:41   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 17:21 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-08-27 17:34   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-27 18:23     ` Andreas Mohr
2006-08-27 18:04   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 18:27     ` Andreas Mohr
2006-08-27 18:35       ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-28  9:06 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-30  9:00 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-30  9:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-30 12:33 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-30 12:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 16:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-30 16:48   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 17:13     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-08-30 17:32       ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200608271801.44774.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zach@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.