All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com,
	B.Steinbrink@gmx.de, arjan@infradead.org,
	chase.venters@clientec.com, akpm@osdl.org,
	rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:28:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608281028.13652.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060828.011929.66059812.davem@davemloft.net>

On Monday 28 August 2006 10:19, David Miller wrote:

> I see it as duplication because the person who writes the
> kernel is the one who ends up writing the libc syscall
> bits or explains to the libc person for that arch how
> things work.  

And the way to explain it is to write the reference code.

> And once one libc implmenetation of this 
> exists, it can be used as a reference for other libc
> variants.

At least on x86-64 various glibc versions had quite buggy
syscall()s, that is why I never trusted it very much.
 
> Finally, once it's done, it's done, and that's it.

Except if you still have to deal with old user land.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-28  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-27 21:47 [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] rename the provided execve functions to kernel_execve Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-28  2:20   ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-08-28  7:44     ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] provide kernel_execve on all architectures Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-29  2:22   ` Ralf Baechle
2006-08-29 17:21   ` David Howells
2006-08-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-28  9:25   ` Andreas Schwab
2006-08-30  5:41   ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-30 12:38     ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-28  7:35   ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-28  7:41     ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-28  7:46       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-28  8:09         ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-28  7:50       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-28  8:01         ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-28  8:03           ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-28  8:09             ` David Miller
2006-08-28  8:15               ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-28  8:19                 ` David Miller
2006-08-28  8:28                   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-08-28  8:40                     ` David Woodhouse
2006-08-28  8:53                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-28 10:00                         ` David Woodhouse
2006-08-28 10:37                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-28 10:58                             ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-28 14:05                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-28 14:42                             ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-28 15:46                               ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-28 17:00                                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 17:45                                   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-28 20:20                               ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-08-28 21:23                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-30  5:44                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-30  7:22                                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 21:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] remove the global errno from the kernel Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-29 17:23   ` David Howells
2006-08-27 22:00 ` [PATCH 5/7] sh64: remove the use of kernel syscalls Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-28  8:05   ` Paul Mundt
2006-08-27 22:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] introduce kernel_execve Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-29  9:12 ` [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ David Howells
2006-08-29  9:37   ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-29  9:38   ` Haavard Skinnemoen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200608281028.13652.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=chase.venters@clientec.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.