All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Paul E McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] RCU: use a separate softirq
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:41:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060828161112.GD3325@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060828160845.GB3325@in.ibm.com>


Finally, RCU gets its own softirq. With it being used extensively,
the per-cpu tasklet used earlier was just a softirq with overheads.
This makes things more efficient.

Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
---


 include/linux/interrupt.h |    3 ++-
 kernel/rcuclassic.c       |   12 +++++-------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-softirq kernel/rcuclassic.c
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu/kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-softirq	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu-dipankar/kernel/rcuclassic.c	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_bh_data) = { 0L };
 
 /* Fake initialization required by compiler */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_struct, rcu_tasklet) = {NULL};
 static int blimit = 10;
 static int qhimark = 10000;
 static int qlowmark = 100;
@@ -212,7 +211,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data
 	if (!rdp->donelist)
 		rdp->donetail = &rdp->donelist;
 	else
-		tasklet_schedule(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, rdp->cpu));
+		raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -363,7 +362,6 @@ static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
 					&per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu));
 	put_cpu_var(rcu_data);
 	put_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data);
-	tasklet_kill_immediate(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu), cpu);
 }
 
 #else
@@ -375,7 +373,7 @@ static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
 #endif
 
 /*
- * This does the RCU processing work from tasklet context. 
+ * This does the RCU processing work from softirq context. 
  */
 static void __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp,
 					struct rcu_data *rdp)
@@ -420,7 +418,7 @@ static void __rcu_process_callbacks(stru
 		rcu_do_batch(rdp);
 }
 
-static void rcu_process_callbacks(unsigned long unused)
+static void rcu_process_callbacks(struct softirq_action *unused)
 {
 	__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_ctrlblk, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_data));
 	__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data));
@@ -484,7 +482,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int us
 		rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
 	} else if (!in_softirq())
 		rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
-	tasklet_schedule(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu));
+	raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
 }
 
 static void rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp,
@@ -507,7 +505,7 @@ static void __devinit rcu_online_cpu(int
 
 	rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_ctrlblk, rdp);
 	rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_bh_ctrlblk, bh_rdp);
-	tasklet_init(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu), rcu_process_callbacks, 0UL);
+	open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks, NULL);
 }
 
 static int __devinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
diff -puN include/linux/interrupt.h~rcu-softirq include/linux/interrupt.h
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu/include/linux/interrupt.h~rcu-softirq	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu-dipankar/include/linux/interrupt.h	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
@@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ enum
 	NET_TX_SOFTIRQ,
 	NET_RX_SOFTIRQ,
 	BLOCK_SOFTIRQ,
-	TASKLET_SOFTIRQ
+	TASKLET_SOFTIRQ,
+	RCU_SOFTIRQ	/* Preferable RCU should always be the last softirq */
 };
 
 /* softirq mask and active fields moved to irq_cpustat_t in

_

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-28 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-28 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] RCU: split classic rcu Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-31  1:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-08-28 16:11 ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2006-08-31  1:13   ` [PATCH 2/4] RCU: use a separate softirq Paul E. McKenney
2006-08-28 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] RCU: preemptible RCU implementation Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 20:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-29  1:33     ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] RCU: clean up RCU trace Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:15 ` [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-28 16:29   ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:33     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-28 16:43       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-28 19:16   ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 19:40     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-29  0:23       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-29  0:28         ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-30  0:40       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060828161112.GD3325@in.ibm.com \
    --to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.