From: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
To: Ikhwan Lee <ikhwan.lee@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: Voltage/power domain framework?
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:24:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060828202446.GA26848@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00c701c6c9ce$a721bd50$4686190c@dsn.sec.samsung.com>
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 08:48:01PM +0900, Ikhwan Lee wrote:
> Thanks for your note,
>
> > > I've seen quite a few discussions mentioning the necessity of
> voltage/power
> > > domain framework. Is there any project going on? I heard that there were
> > > some activities by Nokia, but I could not find any on the web.
> >
> > There isn't anything formal going on. However; there is a loose
> > collection of folks working on the "operating point" patches with an eye
> > to defining a lower level interface to enable voltage/power/clock domain
> > framework's.
>
> I have been following the threads on both PowerOp and OpPoint; however, I
> never thought they would do the job of voltage/power/clock domain
> frameworks. The way I interpreted is that they _need_ the domain frameworks
> so that they could handle lower-level physics better.
>
> > Do you have some design ideas, patches, or requirements in this area that
> could be
> > taken into account?
>
> I have requirements and some very rough ideas. And I was searching for an
> existing implementation or a discussion so that I can find a place to start
> with. Maybe we can start by writing down the requirements. As far as I know,
> the CELF PM Requirement document does not have a section for voltage/power
> domain frameworks.
If you provide me with content then I would be happy to add such a
section or welcome you to edit the public wiki yourself ;)
--mgross
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-28 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.2682.1156469445.1142.linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
2006-08-25 7:50 ` Voltage/power domain framework? Ikhwan Lee
2006-08-25 18:00 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-27 11:48 ` Ikhwan Lee
2006-08-27 18:50 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-28 20:24 ` Mark Gross [this message]
2006-08-26 13:13 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060828202446.GA26848@linux.intel.com \
--to=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ikhwan.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.