From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1443E67B6D for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:46:02 +1000 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:01:43 +0200 From: "Gerhard Pircher" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060830090143.44170@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060829150759.269420@gmx.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] EHCI Oops on CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE system To: Marcus Comstedt Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:04:44 +0200 Von: Marcus Comstedt An: "Gerhard Pircher" Betreff: Re: [PATCH] EHCI Oops on CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE system > > "Gerhard Pircher" writes: > > > Hi Marcus, > > > > I guess this message should also be forwarded to > > linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net. I hope the developers there can > > make some comments. > > > > Gerhard > > > Well, I figured the first thing to do would be to reach a consensus > here on whether or not atomic_t:s in DMA memory should be ruled as > unallowed. Judging from the massive silence, there doesn't seem to be > any strong opinions either way though... > > > // Marcus > You're right. Maybe it's a topic for the linuxppc-embedded mailing list, because mostly embedded platforms use the CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE option. Gerhard -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer