From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Horms Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: framework and i386 (Take XIV) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 22:06:06 +0900 Message-ID: <20060905130606.GP3930@verge.net.au> References: <20060517024402.GA13874@verge.net.au> <20060517045322.GA24072@verge.net.au> <20060517095213.GA31686@verge.net.au> <805b0fdb70b2ca542d6f9f43c0936928@cl.cam.ac.uk> <20060518033753.GB13670@verge.net.au> <20060525072017.GA25881@verge.net.au> <20060711033900.GA26632@verge.net.au> <20060811074839.GA21317@verge.net.au> <20060831074259.GB23148@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Kazuo Moriwaka Cc: Ian Pratt , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Zou, Nanhai" , Akio Takebe , Magnus Damm , Isaku Yamahata , Mark Williamson , xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 08:43:44PM +0900, Kazuo Moriwaka wrote: > On 8/31/06, Horms wrote: > > >x86_64: > > > >Probably working fine, but I can't test this as dom0 refuses to boot for > >me on xen-unstable-11388 (50aea0ec406b). That is, even without the > >kexec patches. I'm not sure what the problem is and I've devicided to > >get these patches out rather and investigate later. > > I tried some versions of xen with kdump patches on x86_64, > following is the result. > I'm sorry for it wasn't done in systematic style. > > chengeset result > 11414 doesn't boot > 11251 doesn't boot > 11134 doesn't boot > 11076 boot Thanks, that is valuable information. I am guessing that doing a bisection between 11134 and 11076 would help shed some light and what has gone astray. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/