From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Resubmit: Intel 965 Express AGP patches
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:02:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060906160210.GK15918@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <115747785570-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net>
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:37:32AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The following should be the updated patch series for the Intel 965 Express
> support, unless I'm making some mistake with git-send-email. I think I've
> covered Dave's concerns
This chunk seems unrelated to 965 support.
@@ -1469,7 +1570,7 @@ static struct agp_bridge_driver intel_91
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.aperture_sizes = intel_i830_sizes,
.size_type = FIXED_APER_SIZE,
- .num_aperture_sizes = 3,
+ .num_aperture_sizes = 4,
.needs_scratch_page = TRUE,
.configure = intel_i915_configure,
.fetch_size = intel_i915_fetch_size,
It seems to be a valid fix (as there are indeed 4 entries in
intel_i830_sizes), but I wonder if this was intentional ?
Has this been tested on 915/945?
I've chopped this bit out and committed the rest, we can
add this as a separate commit, which may ease future bisecting
if anything should go awry.
The intel_830_driver struct also lists the num of sizes as '3' btw.
It could just be lots of cut-n-paste braindamage, but things like
this make me nervous in a driver that supports so much hardware
and is so.. twisted.
Also, do we need an entry in agp_intel_resume() for the 965 ?
>, except for making the PCI ID stuff table-driven.
> You can find a patch for that on the intel-agp-i965 branch at
> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/~anholt/linux-2.6
I'll take a look at those soon.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-06 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-05 17:37 Resubmit: Intel 965 Express AGP patches Eric Anholt
2006-09-05 17:37 ` [PATCH] Add support for Intel i965G/Q GARTs Eric Anholt
2006-09-05 17:37 ` [PATCH] Whitespace cleanup, remove an unnecessary comment, and remove an unnecessary include Eric Anholt
2006-09-05 17:37 ` [PATCH] Remove attribution section, which is unnecessary with revision control Eric Anholt
2006-09-06 16:02 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-09-06 16:56 ` Resubmit: Intel 965 Express AGP patches Eric Anholt
2006-09-06 17:22 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06 17:55 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060906160210.GK15918@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.