From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
Cc: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [MMC] Fix SD timeout calculation
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:58:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060907125840.GA6015@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060618123432.15915.71389.stgit@poseidon.drzeus.cx>
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:34:37PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Secure Digital cards use a different algorithm to calculate the timeout
> for data transfers. Using the MMC one works often, but not always.
Applied, thanks.
I'm wondering about this cleanup though - both the timeout calculations
appear to be identical, so making this a library function seems to be
the right way to go... unless you know different?
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
index c0c7ef2..74eaaee 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
@@ -247,6 +247,55 @@ int mmc_wait_for_app_cmd(struct mmc_host
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_wait_for_app_cmd);
+/**
+ * mmc_set_data_timeout - set the timeout for a data command
+ * @data: data phase for command
+ * @card: the MMC card associated with the data transfer
+ * @write: flag to differentiate reads from writes
+ */
+void mmc_set_data_timeout(struct mmc_data *data, const struct mmc_card *card,
+ int write)
+{
+ unsigned int mult;
+
+ /*
+ * SD cards use a 100 multiplier rather than 10
+ */
+ mult = mmc_card_sd(card) ? 100 : 10;
+
+ /*
+ * Scale up the multiplier (and therefore the timeout) by
+ * the r2w factor for writes.
+ */
+ if (write)
+ mult <<= card->csd.r2w_factor;
+
+ data->timeout_ns = card->csd.tacc_ns * mult;
+ data->timeout_clks = card->csd.tacc_clks * mult;
+
+ /*
+ * SD cards also have an upper limit on the timeout.
+ */
+ if (mmc_card_sd(card)) {
+ unsigned int timeout_us, limit_us;
+
+ timeout_us = data->timeout_ns / 1000;
+ timeout_us += data->timeout_clks * 1000 /
+ (card->host->ios.clock / 1000);
+
+ if (write)
+ limit_us = 250000;
+ else
+ limit_us = 100000;
+
+ if (timeout_us > limit_us) {
+ data->timeout_ns = limit_us * 1000;
+ data->timeout_clks = 0;
+ }
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_set_data_timeout);
+
static int mmc_select_card(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_card *card);
/**
@@ -908,12 +957,9 @@ static void mmc_read_scrs(struct mmc_hos
{
int err;
struct mmc_card *card;
-
struct mmc_request mrq;
struct mmc_command cmd;
struct mmc_data data;
- unsigned int timeout_us;
-
struct scatterlist sg;
list_for_each_entry(card, &host->cards, node) {
@@ -948,17 +994,7 @@ static void mmc_read_scrs(struct mmc_hos
memset(&data, 0, sizeof(struct mmc_data));
- data.timeout_ns = card->csd.tacc_ns * 100;
- data.timeout_clks = card->csd.tacc_clks * 100;
-
- timeout_us = data.timeout_ns / 1000;
- timeout_us += data.timeout_clks * 1000 /
- (host->ios.clock / 1000);
-
- if (timeout_us > 100000) {
- data.timeout_ns = 100000000;
- data.timeout_clks = 0;
- }
+ mmc_set_data_timeout(&data, card, 0);
data.blksz_bits = 3;
data.blksz = 1 << 3;
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc_block.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc_block.c
index 515fb22..d6fcc46 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/mmc_block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc_block.c
@@ -179,40 +179,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_q
brq.stop.arg = 0;
brq.stop.flags = MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
- brq.data.timeout_ns = card->csd.tacc_ns * 10;
- brq.data.timeout_clks = card->csd.tacc_clks * 10;
-
- /*
- * Scale up the timeout by the r2w factor
- */
- if (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE) {
- brq.data.timeout_ns <<= card->csd.r2w_factor;
- brq.data.timeout_clks <<= card->csd.r2w_factor;
- }
-
- /*
- * SD cards use a 100 multiplier and has a upper limit
- */
- if (mmc_card_sd(card)) {
- unsigned int limit_us, timeout_us;
-
- brq.data.timeout_ns *= 10;
- brq.data.timeout_clks *= 10;
-
- if (rq_data_dir(req) == READ)
- limit_us = 100000;
- else
- limit_us = 250000;
-
- timeout_us = brq.data.timeout_ns / 1000;
- timeout_us += brq.data.timeout_clks * 1000 /
- (card->host->ios.clock / 1000);
-
- if (timeout_us > limit_us) {
- brq.data.timeout_ns = limit_us * 1000;
- brq.data.timeout_clks = 0;
- }
- }
+ mmc_set_data_timeout(&brq.data, card, rq_data_dir(req) != READ);
if (rq_data_dir(req) == READ) {
brq.cmd.opcode = brq.data.blocks > 1 ? MMC_READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK : MMC_READ_SINGLE_BLOCK;
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
index 03a14a3..627e2c0 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ extern int mmc_wait_for_cmd(struct mmc_h
extern int mmc_wait_for_app_cmd(struct mmc_host *, unsigned int,
struct mmc_command *, int);
+extern void mmc_set_data_timeout(struct mmc_data *, const struct mmc_card *, int);
+
extern int __mmc_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_card *card);
static inline void mmc_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-07 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-18 12:34 [PATCH] [MMC] Fix SD timeout calculation Pierre Ossman
2006-06-18 12:42 ` Pierre Ossman
2006-09-07 12:58 ` Russell King [this message]
2006-09-07 14:51 ` Pierre Ossman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060907125840.GA6015@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.