From: Amy Griffis <amy.griffis@hp.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update audit rule change messages
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:46:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060907214618.GE12003@fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200609071722.53652.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Steve Grubb wrote: [Thu Sep 07 2006, 05:22:53PM EDT]
> Do you mind if we switch the order of these? Maybe path, key, list.
Done.
Make the audit message for implicit rule removal more informative.
Make the rule update message consistent with other messages.
Signed-off-by: Amy Griffis <amy.griffis@hp.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index cba0708..a44879b 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ static void audit_update_watch(struct au
}
ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE);
- audit_log_format(ab, "audit updated rules specifying watch=");
+ audit_log_format(ab, "audit updated rules specifying path=");
audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, owatch->path);
audit_log_format(ab, " with dev=%u ino=%lu\n", dev, ino);
audit_log_end(ab);
@@ -954,19 +954,28 @@ static void audit_remove_parent_watches(
struct audit_watch *w, *nextw;
struct audit_krule *r, *nextr;
struct audit_entry *e;
+ struct audit_buffer *ab;
mutex_lock(&audit_filter_mutex);
parent->flags |= AUDIT_PARENT_INVALID;
list_for_each_entry_safe(w, nextw, &parent->watches, wlist) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(r, nextr, &w->rules, rlist) {
e = container_of(r, struct audit_entry, rule);
+
+ ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE);
+ audit_log_format(ab, "audit implicitly removed rule path=");
+ audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, w->path);
+ if (r->filterkey) {
+ audit_log_format(ab, " key=");
+ audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, r->filterkey);
+ } else
+ audit_log_format(ab, " key=(null)");
+ audit_log_format(ab, " list=%d", r->listnr);
+ audit_log_end(ab);
+
list_del(&r->rlist);
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule_rcu);
-
- audit_log(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE,
- "audit implicitly removed rule from list=%d\n",
- AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT);
}
audit_remove_watch(w);
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-07 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-07 21:07 [PATCH] update audit rule change messages Amy Griffis
2006-09-07 21:22 ` Steve Grubb
2006-09-07 21:46 ` Amy Griffis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060907214618.GE12003@fc.hp.com \
--to=amy.griffis@hp.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.